In ruins: A boy stands in the shell of the parliament building in Somalia. Photo: Reuters

In ruins: A boy stands in the shell of the parliament building in Somalia. Photo: Reuters

Compared with the trillions of dollars flowing through the international  financial system every day, the estimated $US1.3 billion ($1.46 billion) sent  each year from  storefronts in Somali neighbourhoods in places such as London  and Minneapolis to families back home in the Horn of Africa is a  droplet.

In a country where 40 per cent of the population depends on remittances from  relatives abroad, however, these transactions are a lifeline.  But the same  money transfer services that help keep children in school and older relatives  off the streets  can also be used to send money to help finance groups such as   al-Shabab, the feared Islamist militants who once controlled much of the  country.

Humanitarian groups, politicians and Somalis are now sounding the alarm over  plans by the British bank Barclays to suspend the accounts of a number of money  transfer companies  rather than risk a run-in with regulators over potentially  abetting the financing of terrorists or money laundering.

”Millions of people depend on the remittances from outside,” said Shukri  Ismail, one of the founders of Candlelight, a non-profit organisation in the  northern region of Somaliland. ”If those remittances stop, it will be literally  chaos.”

The looming cut-off, expected  on August 10, comes  as more and more Somalis  have returned from abroad to invest in their home country. In June, the  International Monetary Fund established relations with Somalia for the first  time in more than two decades.

Mo Farah, the British Olympic gold medallist born in Somalia, has lent his  celebrity to the cause, asking for a 12-month extension before the cut-off.

”Everyone following the issue understands that Barclays has a bank to run,  but this decision could mean life or death to millions of Somalis,” Farah  said.

If the  transfer businesses are shut down, experts say,  transfers will not  go through other official channels but will be driven underground, making it  harder to track money going to militant groups.

Barclays has come under pressure because it is one of the last banks in  Britain providing services to the money transfer businesses.  In December, the  bank HSBC had to pay the US government a record fine of $US1.9 billion to settle  charges  it had worked with Saudi Arabian banks linked to terrorist  organisations.

New York Times

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/barclays-decision-could-transfer-pain-to-somalis-20130804-2r7fl.html#ixzz2bINru5Pg

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *